AI-Enabled Cybersecurity Threat Prediction and Response Systems for Distributed Computing Environments

Authors

  • M. Devendra Patel Department of Computer Engineering, Government College of Engineering, Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V1I6P102

Keywords:

Distributed Cybersecurity, Graph Neural Networks, Streaming Anomaly Detection, Federated Learning, Zero-Trust Architecture, Reinforcement Learning For Response, Digital-Twin Simulation, Adversarial Robustness, Differential Privacy, MLOps, Explainable AI, Lateral Movement Detection

Abstract

Distributed computing environments spanning cloud, edge, and on-prem clusters amplify the attack surface, the velocity of threats, and the cost of delayed responses. This paper proposes an AI-enabled threat prediction and response architecture that fuses streaming telemetry (logs, traces, metrics, flows) with graph-based security analytics and probabilistic forecasting to anticipate compromise before service-level objectives are violated. A multimodal detection stack combines self-supervised embeddings for rare-event sensitivity, graph neural networks for lateral-movement path inference, and online anomaly detectors calibrated with conformal risk controls to bound false positives under drift. To translate predictions into action, we integrate a safety-aware policy layer: rule-constrained reinforcement learning selects minimally disruptive mitigations (isolation, policy tightening, token revocation) and is gated by a digital-twin simulator to prevent unsafe rollouts. Privacy and jurisdictional constraints are addressed through federated training with secure aggregation and differential privacy on labeled incident snippets. The system is production-minded: models are packaged with MLOps guardrails, continuous evaluation, and explainability artifacts (counterfactuals, feature attributions) for analyst trust and audit. Empirically, the approach is designed to improve early-warning horizon for high-severity events, reduce median time-to-mitigation, and maintain sub-percent enforcement overhead on latency-critical paths. We discuss deployment patterns for zero-trust, identity-centric networks and outline hardening against adversarial ML. The result is a cohesive, testable pathway from real-time prediction to safe, automated response in heterogeneous, distributed infrastructures

References

[1] Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science. https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~aaroth/Papers/privacybook.pdf

[2] Bonawitz, K., et al. (2017). Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning. ACM CCS. https://research.google/pubs/practical-secure-aggregation-for-privacy-preserving-machine-learning/

[3] Liu, F. T., Ting, K. M., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2008). Isolation Forest. IEEE ICDM. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4781136

[4] Guha, S., Mishra, N., Roy, G., & Schrijver, K. (2016). Robust Random Cut Forest for Anomaly Detection on Streams. ICML. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v48/guha16.html

[5] He, P., Zhu, J., He, S., Li, J., & Lyu, M. R. (2017). Drain: An Online Log Parsing Approach. IEEE TDSC. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8519258

[6] Du, M., Li, F., Zheng, G., & Srikumar, V. (2017). DeepLog: Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis from System Logs. ACM CCS. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3133956.3134015

[7] Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks. ICML. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/guo17a.html

[8] Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. ICLR. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02907

[9] Hamilton, W., Ying, Z., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs (GraphSAGE). NeurIPS. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.02216

[10] Veličković, P., et al. (2018). Graph Attention Networks. ICLR. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10903

[11] Bai, S., Kolter, J. Z., & Koltun, V. (2018). An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling (TCN). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.01271

[12] Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. Machine Learning. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1010933404324

[13] Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine. Annals of Statistics. https://projecteuclid.org/journals/annals-of-statistics/volume-29/issue-5/Greedy-function-approximation--A-gradient-boosting-machine/10.1214/aos/1013203451.full

[14] Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017). Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347

[15] García, J., & Fernández, F. (2015). A Comprehensive Survey on Safe Reinforcement Learning. JMLR. https://www.jmlr.org/papers/v16/garcia15a.html

[16] Høiland-Jørgensen, T., et al. (2018). The eBPF Linux In-Kernel Virtual Machine. netdev conf. https://www.netdevconf.org/2.1/papers/ebpf.pdf

[17] Moustafa, N., & Slay, J. (2015). UNSW-NB15: A Comprehensive Data Set for Network Intrusion Detection Systems. MilCIS. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7348942

[18] Sharafaldin, I., Lashkari, A. H., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018). Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset (CICIDS2017). IEEE ICCWS. https://www.unb.ca/cic/datasets/ids-2017.html

[19] Kent, A. D. (2015). Comprehensive, Multi-Source Cyber-Security Events (LANL Authentication Dataset). Los Alamos National Laboratory. https://csr.lanl.gov/data/cyber1/

Downloads

Published

2019-11-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
M. D. Patel, “AI-Enabled Cybersecurity Threat Prediction and Response Systems for Distributed Computing Environments”, AIJCST, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 11–23, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V1I6P102.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 99

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.