From Legacy Back Office to Intelligent Utility Enterprise a Practitioner Case Study of SAP Cloud Transformation and Utility IT Landscape Modernization

Authors

  • Gururaj Veershetty Shrewsbury Massachusetts. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V1I1P103

Keywords:

SAP S/4HANA, SAP For Utilities, Cloud Transformation, Integration Architecture, SAP Cloud Integration Gateway, SAP CPI, SAP Cloud Platform, Utility IT Landscape, Enterprise Architecture, Intelligent Enterprise

Abstract

Utilities operate complex, regulated, and legacy-heavy technology estates in which modernization must improve agility without compromising reliability, controls, or operational continuity. This practitioner case study describes how a large energy utility moved from a fragmented back-office environment toward a cloud-based SAP digital core supported by cloud line-of-business applications, a standardized integration backbone, and a real-time data foundation. The landscape is described explicitly in utility terms: customers, employees, suppliers, field workforce, regulators, and utility operations on one side; SAP cloud applications, integration governance, the SAP S/4HANA digital core, SAP HANA, and SAP Cloud Platform analytics capabilities, and future digitization capabilities such as connected assets, omni-channel service, and automation on the other. The paper contributes a reusable visual architecture pattern and a staged roadmap for utilities planning SAP cloud modernization. Its central argument is that the program's durable value came not only from migrating applications but also from deliberately designing integration, data flow, security, supportability, and operating controls around the digital core.

References

[1] SAP SE. SAP S/4HANA product documentation and release information for SAP S/4HANA 1809. SAP Help Portal, 2018.

[2] SAP SE. SAP Cloud Platform Integration and SAP Cloud Integration Gateway documentation. SAP Help Portal, 2018.

[3] SAP SE. SAP Ariba, SAP Fieldglass, SAP Concur and SAP SuccessFactors product documentation. SAP Help Portal, 2018.

[4] National Institute of Standards and Technology. Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, Version 1.1. NIST, 2018.

[5] The Open Group. TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2. The Open Group, 2018.

[6] International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Information security management systems - Requirements. ISO, 2013.

[7] ISO/IEC/IEEE. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011, Systems and software engineering - Architecture description. ISO/IEC/IEEE, 2011.

[8] Yin, R. K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. SAGE Publications, 2018.

[9] Ross, J. W., Weill, P., and Robertson, D. C. Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press, 2006.

[10] Davenport, T. H. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 121-131, 1998.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
G. Veershetty, “From Legacy Back Office to Intelligent Utility Enterprise a Practitioner Case Study of SAP Cloud Transformation and Utility IT Landscape Modernization”, AIJCST, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–27, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V1I1P103.

Similar Articles

41-50 of 206

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.