Adaptive Resource Management in Cloud-Native Architectures Using Predictive Analytics and Reinforcement Learning Techniques

Authors

  • Dr. Takashi Sato Graduate School of Informatics, Kawasaki Technical University, Tokyo, Japan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V3I2P101

Keywords:

Cloud-Native, Kubernetes, Autoscaling, Predictive Analytics, Reinforcement Learning, PPO, LSTM Forecasting, SLO/SLA Compliance, Cost Optimization, Energy-/Carbon-Aware Scheduling, Digital Twin Simulation, Opentelemetry, Safe Exploration, Aiops/Mlops

Abstract

Cloud-native systems increasingly confront volatile workloads, tight SLOs, and rising cost/energy pressures. This paper proposes an adaptive resource management framework that fuses predictive analytics with reinforcement learning (RL) to optimize autoscaling and scheduling across Kubernetes-based microservices. First, multivariate forecasting models (e.g., LSTM/Temporal-Fusion variants with seasonality regressors) anticipate short-horizon demand, latency, and queue depth using traces and metrics exported via OpenTelemetry. These forecasts parameterize a constrained Markov decision process in which an RL agent (PPO with safe-exploration and cost penalties) learns scaling and placement policies that jointly minimize p95 latency, cloud spend, and energy while meeting per-service SLOs and anti-affinity constraints. To ensure safe rollouts, we employ a digital-twin simulator calibrated from production telemetry for off-policy evaluation, drift detectors for online model recalibration, and canary gating for incremental policy activation. The orchestration layer integrates with HPA/VPA/KEDA, node pools, and spot/On-Demand mixes; actions include replica counts, CPU/memory limits, pod scheduling hints, and serverless concurrency caps. Across mixed OLTP/OLAP traces and bursty event streams, the framework yields consistent gains over threshold-based and purely predictive baselines, reducing SLO violations and cost without sacrificing stability. We discuss explainability (SHAP-based action attributions), carbon-aware placement, and failure-mode containment, and outline an MLOps/AIOps pathway for continuous validation. The result is a pragmatic blueprint to operationalize learning-augmented autoscaling in production, bridging accuracy of demand prediction with the adaptability of RL control

References

[1] Schulman, J. et al. (2017). Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347 (arXiv)

[2] Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (2nd ed.). https://incompleteideas.net/book/the-book-2nd.html (incompleteideas.net)

[3] Mnih, V. et al. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14236 (Nature)

[4] Lillicrap, T. P. et al. (2016). Continuous Control with Deep RL (DDPG). https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.02971 (arXiv)

[5] Haarnoja, T. et al. (2018). Soft Actor-Critic (SAC). https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/haarnoja18b/haarnoja18b.pdf (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research)

[6] Taylor, S. J., & Letham, B. (2017). Prophet: Forecasting at Scale (paper). https://facebook.github.io/prophet/static/prophet_paper_20170113.pdf (Facebook GitHub)

[7] Salinas, D. et al. (2017). DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive RNNs. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04110 (arXiv)

[8] Rawlings, J. B., Mayne, D. Q., & Diehl, M. (2017). Model Predictive Control: Theory, Computation, and Design (2e). https://sites.engineering.ucsb.edu/~jbraw/mpc/MPC-book-2nd-edition-1st-printing.pdf (sites.engineering.ucsb.edu)

[9] Achiam, J. et al. (2017). Constrained Policy Optimization. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.10528 (arXiv)

[10] Calheiros, R. N. et al. (2011). CloudSim: A Toolkit for Modeling and Simulation of Cloud Computing. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/spe.995 (Wiley Online Library)

[11] Astrom, K. J., & Wittenmark, B. Adaptive Control, 2nd Edition. Addison-Wesley, 1995.

[12] Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., & Reinsel, G. C. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, 3rd Edition. Prentice-Hall, 1994.

[13] Bolch, G., Greiner, S., de Meer, H., & Trivedi, K. S. Queueing Networks and Markov Chains: Modeling and Performance Evaluation with Computer Science Applications. John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

[14] Designing LTE-Based Network Infrastructure for Healthcare IoT Application - Varinder Kumar Sharma - IJAIDR Volume 10, Issue 2, July-December 2019. DOI 10.71097/IJAIDR.v10.i2.1540

Downloads

Published

2021-03-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
T. Sato, “Adaptive Resource Management in Cloud-Native Architectures Using Predictive Analytics and Reinforcement Learning Techniques”, AIJCST, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–10, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V3I2P101.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 98

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.