Autonomous DevSecOps Agent for Continuous Governance and Compliance in Multi-Cloud DXPs

Authors

  • Siva Sai Krishna Suryadevara Sr. AEM Developer at Maganti IT Resources, USA. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V5I1P104

Keywords:

Autonomous Devsecops, Multi-Cloud Governance, Digital Experience Platforms (Dxps), Continuous Compliance, Policy-As-Code, Drift Detection, AI Agents, Zero-Trust Security

Abstract

Digital experience platforms (DXPs) that work on their own are increasingly using many other clouds to reach clients all over the world. However, this flexibility increases risk because policies, data standards as well as security measures must stay the same while services are always changing. Governance and compliance are no longer just checks that happen every now and then. They are now dynamic assurances that configurations, identities & data flows are safe, legal, and able to be audited across different providers along with nations. Most modern DevSecOps and governance frameworks are more reactive & broken up into these parts. They find problems after deployment, rely on their human approvals, have trouble linking drift across cloud environments and infrastructure-as-code (IaC), and rarely turn huge rules into actual time, actionable controls. This post talks about an Autonomous DevSecOps Agent that makes sure compliance is built into the delivery process and keeps an eye on things all the time. The agent keeps an eye on Infrastructure as Code, runtime telemetry, identity events & policy libraries all the time. It then analyzes them to find and fix any other problems before they are deployed. Basic skills include turning intent into policy, figuring out the risks of changes before they happen, finding and fixing drift on your own, aligning policies across these clouds, self-healing remediations with human oversight levels, and automatically gathering evidence for audits. The methodology combines a modular multi-cloud control plane, rule-based and machine learning-assisted reasoning, and closed-loop orchestration into a framework for continuous integration and continuous deployment. Validation is performed via a case study on a production-like DXP that includes AWS, Azure, and GCP, using realistic workloads, compliance baselines & fault injection to mimic actual world changes in operations. The results show that the time it takes to find and fix these problems has gone down, the amount of configuration drift has gone down, the number of policy violations during runtime has gone down, and audit readiness has gone up thanks to the constant creation of traceable compliance artifacts. This shows that autonomous governance can make multi-cloud DXPs both flexible and dependable.

References

[1] Hsu, Tony Hsiang-Chih. Hands-On Security in DevOps: Ensure continuous security, deployment, and delivery with DevSecOps. Packt Publishing Ltd, 2018.

[2] Tan, Junsheng. "Ensuring component dependencies and facilitating documentation by applying Open Policy Agent in a DevSecOps cloud environment." (2022).

[3] Michael, Lee. "Integrating Continuous Security Validation into DevSecOps Pipelines for Regulatory Compliance." (2019).

[4] SOLANKE, ADEDAMOLA ABIODUN. "Enterprise DevSecOps: Integrating security into CI/CD pipelines for regulated industries." (2022).

[5] Parakala, Adityamallikarjunkumar. "Integrating Salesforce and UiPath: Cross-System Intelligent Automation." International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology 3.4 (2022): 88-99.

[6] Smith, Jordan, and Dash Karan. "MLOps-Enabled DevSecOps: Automating Compliance and Risk Mitigation in Agile Workflows." (2020).

[7] Tiensuu, Tuomas. "DevSecOps adoption: Improving visibility in application security." (2022).

[8] Gopireddy, Satheesh Reddy. "Automated Compliance as Code for Multi-Jurisdictional Cloud Deployments." European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology 7.11 (2020): 104-108.

[9] Chandramouli, Ramaswamy. "Implementation of devsecops for a microservices-based application with service mesh." NIST Special Publication 800 (2022): 204C.

[10] Koskinen, Anna. "DevSecOps: building security into the core of DevOps." (2019).

[11] Parakala, Adityamallikarjunkumar, and Jyothirmay Swain. "AI‑Powered Intelligent Automation Emerges." International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Data Science, and Machine Learning 3.4 (2022): 96-106.

[12] Wei, Liu. "AI-Augmented DevSecOps Pipelines: Enabling Continuous Security Integration in Large-Scale Software System." American International Journal of Computer Science and Technology 1.5 (2019): 1-9.

[13] Tortoriello, Valentina. Definition of a DevSecOps Operating Model for software development in a large Enterprise. Diss. Politecnico di Torino, 2022.

[14] Santos, Maria Eduarda Oliveira. "Responsible Software Development Framework for Cloud-Native Financial Applications: Leveraging Safe Reinforcement Learning and Ethical AI Governance." International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management (IJRPETM) 4.6 (2021): 5905-5908.

[15] Gowda, Harish Govinda. "Optimizing software delivery with event-driven DevSecOps pipelines in AWS and GCP." International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology 8.6 (2020): 1.

[16] Allam, Hitesh. "Security-Driven Pipelines: Embedding DevSecOps into CI/CD Workflows." International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology 3.1 (2022): 86-97.

[17] Basu, Ganapathi. "Linux & unix System Administration AI-Augmented Troubleshooting in Multi-OS unix Environments." (2021).

Published

2023-01-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
S. S. K. Suryadevara, “Autonomous DevSecOps Agent for Continuous Governance and Compliance in Multi-Cloud DXPs”, AIJCST, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 36–49, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V5I1P104.

Similar Articles

11-20 of 173

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.