Transforming Software Quality Assurance through Artificial Intelligence, Automated Testing, and Intelligent Software Analytics

Authors

  • Kiran Paul Kanikaram Software QA Manager, Vitech Systems Group, USA. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V7I5P109

Keywords:

Software Quality Assurance, Artificial Intelligence, Automated Testing, Machine Learning, Intelligent Software Analytics, Defect Prediction, Continuous Integration, Software Reliability, DevOps, Quality Engineering

Abstract

Software Quality Assurance (SQA) plays a vital role in ensuring the reliability and performance of modern software systems. However, the increasing complexity of software applications, rapid development cycles, and adoption of technologies such as CI/CD, cloud computing, microservices, and distributed systems have created new challenges for traditional quality assurance approaches. Manual testing and conventional automation techniques are often unable to meet the demands of these dynamic environments. As a result, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Automated Testing, and Intelligent Software Analytics have emerged as effective solutions for improving software quality and testing efficiency. This study explores the integration of AI-driven techniques into software quality assurance processes and examines their impact on testing effectiveness, defect detection, and overall software reliability. The proposed framework combines machine learning-based defect prediction, automated test execution, and intelligent analytics to support continuous quality monitoring and informed decision-making. By analyzing software development data such as source code, defect records, user feedback, and runtime information, the framework helps identify potential risks and optimize testing activities. The findings indicate that AI-powered quality assurance can significantly improve defect detection rates, increase test coverage, reduce testing time, and lower maintenance costs. Furthermore, intelligent analytics enables organizations to identify quality issues at an early stage and take preventive actions before software release. The study demonstrates that integrating AI, automated testing, and software analytics can create a more efficient and reliable quality assurance ecosystem, supporting faster software delivery while maintaining high quality standards. Future research may focus on explainable AI, autonomous quality engineering systems, and deeper integration with DevSecOps practices.

References

[1] Mohapatra, P. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence and machine learning for test engineers: concepts in software quality assurance. Intelligent Assurance: Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software Testing in the Modern Development Lifecycle, 4, 17.

[2] Singh, G., Choudhary, J., & Laddhani, L. K. (2023). Enhancing testing efficiency through the implementation of an optimal test automation framework selection model. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 11(3), 298–307.

[3] Myers, G. J., Badgett, T., Thomas, T. M., & Sandler, C. (2004). The art of software testing (Vol. 2). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

[4] Ammann, P., & Offutt, J. (2017). Introduction to software testing. Cambridge University Press.

[5] Harman, M., Jia, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2015, April). Achievements, open problems and challenges for search based software testing. In 2015 IEEE 8th international conference on software testing, verification and validation (ICST) (pp. 1-12). IEEE.

[6] Menzies, T., Greenwald, J., & Frank, A. (2007). Data mining static code attributes to learn defect predictors. IEEE transactions on software engineering, 33(1), 2-13.

[7] Nagappan, N., & Ball, T. (2007, September). Using software dependencies and churn metrics to predict field failures: An empirical case study. In First international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement (ESEM 2007) (pp. 364-373). IEEE.

[8] Khomh, F., Dhaliwal, T., Zou, Y., & Adams, B. (2012, June). Do faster releases improve software quality? an empirical case study of mozilla firefox. In 2012 9th IEEE working conference on mining software repositories (MSR) (pp. 179-188). IEEE.

[9] Hassan, A. E. (2009, May). Predicting faults using the complexity of code changes. In 2009 IEEE 31st international conference on software engineering (pp. 78-88). IEEE.

[10] Cohen, M. B., Dwyer, M. B., & Shi, J. (2008). Constructing interaction test suites for highly-configurable systems in the presence of constraints: A greedy approach. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 34(5), 633-650.

[11] Li, Z., Harman, M., & Hierons, R. M. (2007). Search algorithms for regression test case prioritization. IEEE Transactions on software engineering, 33(4), 225-237.

[12] Chen, L., Babar, M. A., & Zhang, H. (2010, April). Towards an evidence-based understanding of electronic data sources. In 14th International conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering (EASE). BCS Learning & Development.

[13] Kim, D., Nam, J., Song, J., & Kim, S. (2013, May). Automatic patch generation learned from human-written patches. In 2013 35th international conference on software engineering (ICSE) (pp. 802-811). IEEE.

[14] Alt, R., Auth, G., & Kögler, C. (2021). Continuous innovation with DevOps: IT management in the age of digitalization and software-defined business. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[15] Bertolino, A. (2007, May). Software testing research: Achievements, challenges, dreams. In Future of Software Engineering (FOSE'07) (pp. 85-103). IEEE.

[16] Nikolik, B. (2012). Software quality assurance economics. Information and Software Technology, 54(11), 1229-1238.

[17] Galin, D. (2018). Software quality: concepts and practice. John Wiley & Sons.

[18] Alam, M. M., Priti, S. I., Fatema, K., Hasan, M., & Alam, S. (2024). Ensuring excellence: A review of software quality assurance and continuous improvement in software product development. Achieving sustainable business through AI, technology education and computer science, 331-346.

[19] Ramchand, S., Shaikh, S., & Alam, I. (2021, August). Role of artificial intelligence in software quality assurance. In Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference (pp. 125-136). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

[20] Gurcan, F., Dalveren, G. G. M., Cagiltay, N. E., Roman, D., & Soylu, A. (2022). Evolution of software testing strategies and trends: Semantic content analysis of software research corpus of the last 40 years. IEEE Access, 10, 106093-106109.

[21] Patel, A. R., Ramaiya, K. K., Bhatia, C. V., Shah, H. N., & Bhavsar, S. N. (2020). Artificial intelligence: prospect in mechanical engineering field—a review. Data Science and Intelligent Applications: Proceedings of ICDSIA 2020, 267-282.

[22] Patel, A. R., & Tyagi, S. (2022, August). The state of test automation in DevOps: a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2022 Fourteenth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (pp. 689-695).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
K. P. Kanikaram, “Transforming Software Quality Assurance through Artificial Intelligence, Automated Testing, and Intelligent Software Analytics”, AIJCST, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 103–114, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V7I5P109.

Similar Articles

31-40 of 229

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.