High-Performance Data Management Architectures for Scalable Machine Learning Pipelines in Cloud Ecosystems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V3I2P102Keywords:
Cloud Data Management, Lakehouse, Streaming ETL, Feature Store, Mlops, Orchestration, Data Governance, Data Quality And Observability, Multi-Cloud, Vector Databases, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Incremental Learning, Autoscaling, Cost Optimization, Privacy And Security, ACID Tables, Change Data Capture, Lineage, Reproducibility, Low-Latency InferenceAbstract
Modern machine learning (ML) at cloud scale demands data management architectures that can ingest diverse streams, deliver low-latency feature access, and support reproducible model training and deployment under stringent reliability and governance requirements. This paper proposes a reference architecture that unifies a lakehouse core with a real-time feature store, streaming ETL, and workload-aware storage tiers to balance throughput, latency, and cost. Batch and streaming data are consolidated via schema-evolving, ACID-compliant tables with time-travel for experiment repeatability, while changelog capture and event sourcing enable incremental model refresh and online learning. A control plane built on declarative orchestration coordinates data pipelines, validation, and lineage, and integrates MLOps primitives feature registries, model catalogs, and continuous training/validation backed by observability (data quality SLAs, drift, and freshness monitors). The design supports multi-region and multi-cloud deployments using portable formats and open table protocols, alongside vector indexes for retrieval-augmented generation and feature similarity search. We discuss placement strategies (serverless vs. provisioned), memory-optimized caches for online inference, and autoscaling policies that co-optimize performance and sustainability via workload shaping and tiered storage. A methodology is outlined for benchmarking end-to-end pipeline performance covering ingestion, transformation, feature serving, and model rollout together with governance and privacy controls (row/column-level security, PII tokenization, and federated patterns). The result is an actionable blueprint that enables teams to build resilient, auditable, and cost-efficient ML data planes capable of sustaining rapid iteration and production-grade reliability
References
[1] Armbrust, M., et al. “Delta Lake: High-Performance ACID Table Storage over Cloud Object Stores.” PVLDB 13(12), 2020. https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol13/p3411-armbrust.pdf
[2] Kreps, J., Narkhede, N., Rao, J. “Kafka: a Distributed Messaging System for Log Processing.” 2011. https://notes.stephenholiday.com/Kafka.pdf
[3] Carbone, P., et al. “Apache Flink™: Stream and Batch Processing in a Single Engine.” 2015. https://asterios.katsifodimos.com/assets/publications/flink-deb.pdf
[4] Armbrust, M., et al. “Spark SQL: Relational Data Processing in Spark.” SIGMOD 2015. https://people.csail.mit.edu/matei/papers/2015/sigmod_spark_sql.pdf
[5] Melnik, S., et al. “Dremel: Interactive Analysis of Web-Scale Datasets.” 2010. https://research.google.com/pubs/archive/36632.pdf
[6] Melnik, S., et al. “Dremel: A Decade of Interactive SQL Analysis at Web Scale.” PVLDB 13(12), 2020. https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol13/p3461-melnik.pdf
[7] Dageville, B., et al. “The Snowflake Elastic Data Warehouse.” SIGMOD 2016. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2882903.2903741
[8] Baylor, D., et al. “TFX: A TensorFlow-Based Production-Scale Machine Learning Platform.” KDD 2017. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3097983.3098021
[9] Codd, E. F. (1970). A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks. Communications of the ACM, 13(6), 377–387.
[10] Dennis, J., & Van Horn, E. (1966). Programming Semantics for Multiprogrammed Computations. Communications of the ACM, 9(3), 143–155.
[11] Liskov, B., & Zilles, S. (1974). Programming with Abstract Data Types. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 9(4), 50–59.
[12] Moritz, P., et al. “Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applications.” OSDI 2018. https://www.usenix.org/system/files/osdi18-moritz.pdf
[13] Johnson, J., Douze, M., Jégou, H. “Billion-scale Similarity Search with GPUs.” 2017. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.08734
[14] Enabling Mission-Critical Communication via VoLTE for Public Safety Networks - Varinder Kumar Sharma - IJAIDR Volume 10, Issue 1, January-June 2019. DOI 10.71097/IJAIDR.v10.i1.1539
[15] Stonebraker, M., & Rowe, L. A. “The Design of Postgres.” Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference on Management of Data, 1986, pp. 340–355.
[16] Gray, J., & Reuter, A. Transaction Processing: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
[17] Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. “MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters.” Communications of the ACM, 51(1), 107–113, 2008.
[18] Zaharia, M., Chowdhury, M., Franklin, M. J., Shenker, S., & Stoica, I. “Spark: Cluster Computing with Working Sets.” Proceedings of the 2nd USENIX Conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing (HotCloud ’10), 2010.
[19] Abadi, D. J., Boncz, P. A., & Harizopoulos, S. “Column-Oriented Database Systems.” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 2(2), 1664–1675, 2009.
[20] Armbrust, M., Zaharia, M., Franklin, M. J., Ghodsi, A., Xin, R. S., & Stoica, I. “Spark SQL: Relational Data Processing in Spark.” Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 2015, pp. 1383–1394.
[21] Ghemawat, S., Gobioff, H., & Leung, S.-T. “The Google File System.” ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 37(5), 29–43, 2003.
